<

Isn't Life Terrible

Friday, August 10, 2007

News From The Future - A Report On Film Restoration as of Jan. 1, 2150

Do you remember the pre-virtual flatties? Don’t worry... no one does.

But a small band of so-called ‘film preservationists’ at UMCA have joined forces to restore and present these curios to anyone with the courage and patience to “sit through them.” Most flatties are missing and presumed lost, junked due to their near-total lack of commercial value when the first “immersive media experiences” (as they were then called) flashed onto parietal, temporal and occipital lobes around the world.

“What survived, survived piecemeal,” according to Sky Hepburn, who calls herself a ‘film preservationist’ even though, strictly speaking, there is no ‘film’ left to preserve. “We work with a variety of binary source materials which are themselves re-encodings of long-obsolete single-perspective external media. Sometimes we have just one channel of information to work with, so we can only approximate the original experience.”

“Approximating the experience” is challenging, to say the least. We asked Hepburn to comment on her most difficult restoration work.

  • Planet of the Apes (1968) – “We have the picture element and a commentary track by Roddy McDowell. All attempts to recreate the original dialogue through lip reading have come up empty.”
  • Cabin Boy (1994) – “We have a complete set of all the raw footage as well as the soundtrack mix elements from this classic comedy, but no information as to how it was assembled for release.”
  • Follow That Bird (1985) – “Again, picture elements but no sound. We’ve recreated the portion of the soundtrack spoken by human beings, but all Muppet sequences are currently mute.”
  • The List of Adrian Messenger (1963) – “A heartbreaker. The only John Huston film we have, other than Annie – and our print is missing the last reel. Surviving documentation indicates that the film featured Kirk Douglas, George C. Scott, Tony Curtis, Robert Mitchum, Frank Sinatra and Burt Lancaster, but we can only confirm the participation of the first two.”
  • A Cinerama Space Odyssey (2001) – “The last twenty minutes look as if the original negative was exposed to light during darkroom development.”
  • Scent of Mystery (1960) – “Missing picture and track, but we have the smells.”

There have been successful restorations, however. All of the materials survived for Memento (2000), but the film was, according to Hepburn, “…a hopeless mess. After years of fruitless analysis, somebody, I forget who, suggested we reverse the order of the sequences.” This provided a ‘Rosetta Stone,’ although Hepburn admits that the now fully restored film is “…kind of boring.” The ‘tails out’ technique has been attempted with other films for which all elements still exist, “…with mixed results,” according to Hepburn. “It improves some films, like Citizen Kane (1941), which is far more understandable when you know what ‘Rosebud’ is from the outset.” For other films – like those of David Lynch, for example – the technique yields no discernible effect.

Preservationists may differ in their judgment of individual flattie titles, but all are in agreement as to the most rewarding aspect of their work: discovering and identifying titles that have maltinized.

“We don’t fully understand the process,” says Hepburn, “but apparently, as a film ages, it becomes susceptible to maltinization.” Regardless of content, maltinized films expand over the years, ‘growing’ new opening and closing sequences. Thankfully, these are easy to detect, since the added sequences do not involve players or characters seen in the original film, but rather ‘a universal character’ whom Hepburn believes may well have been the most beloved ‘movie star’ of all time, judging by the sheer number of appearances he made. “Like the Greek chorus, this character exists to explain the story and indicate how an ideal audience would react,” says Hepburn, who’s currently working on “Glasses, Beard and Lapel Pin,” a loving two-week tribute consisting exclusively of excerpted maltinized material. “We believe these sequences stand on their own. They deserve to be seen and appreciated without having to endure the 90 to 130 minute ‘feature films’ that follow and/or precede them. You need to know about these ‘motion pictures,’ but you probably don’t want to actually watch them.”

The first program, subsidized by University of Murdoch California funds, will include the maltinizations of They Died With Their Boots On, Angels with Dirty Faces, Little Caesar, Yankee Doodle Dandy, McClintock, and a collection of shorts made by the National Film Board of Canada and Disney Productions.

Labels: , , , , , ,

7 Comments:

  • This is a joke right?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At August 28, 2007 at 12:48 AM  

  • It's "doesn't get the bit guy" :)

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At August 29, 2007 at 4:20 PM  

  • It's only not a joke if today's date actually IS January 1, 2150, as in the title of the article.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At August 29, 2007 at 5:18 PM  

  • A joke? A joke? Oh, yes, those pre-group entity limbic jolt-fuzzes often prefiguring minor thoracic spasming of the old, non-reparable protoplasm shells.

    Yes. Joke it is.

    P.S. Poor David Lynch -g- (now that I think about it, why am I pitying that rich bastard?) Excellent job, Terrible, most excellent!

    By Blogger fbonzo, At August 29, 2007 at 8:15 PM  

  • I've been trying to redact a compressed file that seems to have been an .avi copy of an ancient document, itself untitled, which contains an overlay of an earlier team attempting to deconstruct the film. These observers, referred to as Joel, Servo, and Crow, made what seemed to be wild guesses and references to current cultural events, eventually calling the work in question "Godzilla and Mothra vs The Big Lobster." Next project will involve reconstructing a file entitled manos_hands-of-doomMST3K.mpg.

    By Blogger Donovan S. Brain, At August 30, 2007 at 2:32 PM  

  • Brilliant

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At September 1, 2007 at 6:50 AM  

  • This is a great comment on what's happening in the world of movies now. As a professional "film handler" working with motion picture FILM, I really do despair for the future of being able to see what all the classic, historic film film directors -- deMille, Ford, Minelli, Wyler, Kubrick ... and even later ones like Spielberg, Lucas, and Coppola -- created. They created movies, ON FILM. Seeing them in some other format on a screen is, technically speaking, NOT what they originally created. I know some will say it doesn't matter, but you don't go to see replicas of the paintings of Renoir or Picasso (in the museum), you go to see the original. Why are there such throngs around the Mona Lisa at the Louvre?!?! You don't go to look at replica sculptures, you appreciate the originals, for the fineness of the execution.

    And despite the claims of the "digerati", these latter day presenting formats (d-cinema, etc.) now being developed are simply not the same, and it's a hoax to make people think they are the same. Come to think of it, maybe we can use that kind of convoluted logic to make photocopies of dollar bills acceptable, too!

    I'll make exceptions to contemporary and future shows which may originate electronically. For that, the discussion is still open. But for movies that originated as FILM, FILM is the correct way to see it and appreciate the aesthetics, and dynamics, of what it is. And was.

    But really, you've done a nice satirical piece, but it's also a little bit worrisome because it is so close to the truth! And maybe Murdoch will buy everything! LOL!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, At September 4, 2007 at 9:47 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]



<< Home